Tas-Sliema is a neighbourhood in Tas-Sliema, Malta. It scores 5.9 out of 10 overall — middling — based on AI analysis of satellite and street-level imagery across five categories.
The strongest measurements here are climate comfort (8.4/10), social infrastructure (8.2/10) and natural features (8.0/10) — climate comfort is the highest single reading on the page.
The weakest are green spaces (3.3/10), privacy (4.0/10) and cultural life (4.3/10). A low reading is not automatically a dealbreaker — green spaces matters far more to some people than others — but it is where Tas-Sliema gives up ground against better-scoring areas.
Green & air covers greenery, air and water quality, and the natural features around the streets. Tas-Sliema scores 5.3/10 here, which struggles.
Underneath it: green spaces 3.3, environmental quality 5.2 and natural features 8.0, each out of 10. The gap between natural features and green spaces is what shapes the category — the area is much better at one than the other.
Comfort & safety covers how the place feels to a person standing in it — space, privacy, scale and street life. Tas-Sliema scores 6.6/10 here, which holds up.
Underneath it: spatial comfort 5.0, privacy 4.0, human scale 7.0, street life 6.9 and climate comfort 8.4. The gap between climate comfort and privacy is what shapes the category — the area is much better at one than the other.
Homes & buildings covers the buildings themselves: their condition, design and upkeep. Tas-Sliema scores 6.3/10 here, which is unremarkable.
Underneath it: building condition 6.0, architectural quality 7.0 and upkeep 6.0.
Shops & services covers the shared side of a place — meeting spots, services, culture and safety. Tas-Sliema scores 6.5/10 here, which holds up.
Underneath it: community spaces 7.0, social infrastructure 8.2, cultural life 4.3, civic governance 5.0 and public safety 6.6. The gap between social infrastructure and cultural life is what shapes the category — the area is much better at one than the other.
Public safety and civic governance are measured at national level rather than street by street, so those two read the same across every area in Malta — treat them as background conditions, not a verdict on this particular block.
Getting around covers how easily you get out of the area and reach what you need. Tas-Sliema scores 4.9/10 here, which struggles.
Underneath it: transit access 5.3 and road connectivity 4.5.
Scores are only useful next to what you actually want from a place. Pulling out the measurements that tend to decide it:
Street life — how much activity the imagery shows on the street itself — scores 6.9/10, with cultural life at 4.3/10, high for a residential area.
Each HoodEx analysis of Tas-Sliema reads satellite and street-level imagery for the area and scores the five categories above; where there is more than one, the page shows the average.
Scores are a starting point, not a substitute for standing on the street. They are consistent — every area is measured the same way, so comparing two of them is meaningful — but they cannot tell you about a noisy neighbour, a good landlord or a bad bus route. People who have lived here can add that sort of detail on this page.
Last updated 2026-03-10.
Tas-Sliema scores 5.9/10 overall, which is middling. Its case rests on comfort & safety (6.6/10); getting around (4.9/10) is the weak point to check before committing.
Walkability has not been scored for Tas-Sliema yet, but transit access scores 5.3/10. Until walkability itself is scored, those are the closest measures available.
Public safety scores 6.6/10, but that figure is national for Malta rather than specific to these streets — HoodEx measures safety at country level. For street-level detail, people who live there are the better source.
All neighbourhoods in Tas-Sliema
Tell HoodEx what matters to you — budget, commute, green space, how lively the street should be — and it ranks every part of Tas-Sliema against your answers. No account needed.