Naarden is a neighbourhood in Gooise Meren, Noord-Holland, Netherlands. It scores 7.5 out of 10 overall — strong — based on AI analysis of satellite and street-level imagery across five categories.
The strongest measurements here are human scale (10.0/10), architectural quality (10.0/10) and community spaces (9.9/10) — human scale is the highest single reading on the page.
The weakest are street life (3.0/10), transit access (4.5/10) and social infrastructure (4.7/10). A low reading is not automatically a dealbreaker — street life matters far more to some people than others — but it is where Naarden gives up ground against better-scoring areas.
Green & air covers greenery, air and water quality, and the natural features around the streets. Naarden scores 8.0/10 here, which does well.
Underneath it: green spaces 9.1, environmental quality 9.5 and natural features 4.9, each out of 10. The gap between environmental quality and natural features is what shapes the category — the area is much better at one than the other.
Comfort & safety covers how the place feels to a person standing in it — space, privacy, scale and street life. Naarden scores 8.0/10 here, which does well.
Underneath it: spatial comfort 9.0, privacy 6.0, human scale 10.0, street life 3.0 and climate comfort 8.2. The gap between human scale and street life is what shapes the category — the area is much better at one than the other.
Homes & buildings covers the buildings themselves: their condition, design and upkeep. Naarden scores 9.4/10 here, which stands out.
Underneath it: building condition 9.0, architectural quality 10.0 and upkeep 9.0.
Shops & services covers the shared side of a place — meeting spots, services, culture and safety. Naarden scores 7.1/10 here, which holds up.
Underneath it: community spaces 9.9, social infrastructure 4.7, cultural life 5.9 and public safety 9.5. The gap between community spaces and social infrastructure is what shapes the category — the area is much better at one than the other.
Public safety and civic governance are measured at national level rather than street by street, so those two read the same across every area in Netherlands — treat them as background conditions, not a verdict on this particular block.
Getting around covers how easily you get out of the area and reach what you need. Naarden scores 5.1/10 here, which struggles.
Underneath it: transit access 4.5 and road connectivity 5.7.
Scores are only useful next to what you actually want from a place. Pulling out the measurements that tend to decide it:
If outdoor and shared space matter to you, both score above average: green spaces 9.1/10, community spaces 9.9/10.
Street life is low at 3.0/10 while privacy scores 6.0/10 — the pattern of a quiet residential area rather than a busy one.
Each HoodEx analysis of Naarden reads satellite and street-level imagery for the area and scores the five categories above; where there is more than one, the page shows the average.
Scores are a starting point, not a substitute for standing on the street. They are consistent — every area is measured the same way, so comparing two of them is meaningful — but they cannot tell you about a noisy neighbour, a good landlord or a bad bus route. People who have lived here can add that sort of detail on this page.
Last updated 2026-07-30.
Naarden scores 7.5/10 overall, which is strong. Its case rests on homes & buildings (9.4/10); getting around (5.1/10) is the weak point to check before committing.
Walkability has not been scored for Naarden yet, but transit access scores 4.5/10. Until walkability itself is scored, those are the closest measures available.
Public safety scores 9.5/10, but that figure is national for Netherlands rather than specific to these streets — HoodEx measures safety at country level. For street-level detail, people who live there are the better source.
All neighbourhoods in Gooise Meren
Tell HoodEx what matters to you — budget, commute, green space, how lively the street should be — and it ranks every part of Gooise Meren against your answers. No account needed.