De Pijp is a neighbourhood in Amsterdam, North Holland, Netherlands. It scores 8.4 out of 10 overall — strong — based on AI analysis of satellite and street-level imagery across five categories.
The strongest measurements here are community spaces (10.0/10), social infrastructure (10.0/10) and cultural life (10.0/10) — community spaces is the highest single reading on the page.
The weakest are privacy (5.0/10), green spaces (6.2/10) and environmental quality (6.9/10). A low reading is not automatically a dealbreaker — privacy matters far more to some people than others — but it is where De Pijp gives up ground against better-scoring areas.
Green & air covers greenery, air and water quality, and the natural features around the streets. De Pijp scores 6.5/10 here, which holds up.
Underneath it: green spaces 6.2 and environmental quality 6.9, each out of 10.
Comfort & safety covers how the place feels to a person standing in it — space, privacy, scale and street life. De Pijp scores 8.0/10 here, which does well.
Underneath it: spatial comfort 8.0, privacy 5.0, human scale 9.0, street life 9.1 and climate comfort 8.3. The gap between street life and privacy is what shapes the category — the area is much better at one than the other.
Homes & buildings covers the buildings themselves: their condition, design and upkeep. De Pijp scores 8.4/10 here, which does well.
Underneath it: building condition 8.0, architectural quality 9.0 and upkeep 8.0.
Shops & services covers the shared side of a place — meeting spots, services, culture and safety. De Pijp scores 9.4/10 here, which stands out.
Underneath it: community spaces 10.0, social infrastructure 10.0, cultural life 10.0 and public safety 7.5. The gap between community spaces and public safety is what shapes the category — the area is much better at one than the other.
Public safety and civic governance are measured at national level rather than street by street, so those two read the same across every area in Netherlands — treat them as background conditions, not a verdict on this particular block.
Getting around covers how easily you get out of the area and reach what you need. De Pijp scores 9.6/10 here, which stands out.
Underneath it: transit access 9.6 and road connectivity 9.7.
Scores are only useful next to what you actually want from a place. Pulling out the measurements that tend to decide it:
Street life — how much activity the imagery shows on the street itself — scores 9.1/10, with cultural life at 10.0/10, high for a residential area.
Transit access scores 9.6/10, above average for public transport options.
Each HoodEx analysis of De Pijp reads satellite and street-level imagery for the area and scores the five categories above; where there is more than one, the page shows the average.
Scores are a starting point, not a substitute for standing on the street. They are consistent — every area is measured the same way, so comparing two of them is meaningful — but they cannot tell you about a noisy neighbour, a good landlord or a bad bus route. People who have lived here can add that sort of detail on this page.
Last updated 2026-08-06.
De Pijp scores 8.4/10 overall, which is strong. Its case rests on getting around (9.6/10); green & air (6.5/10) is the weak point to check before committing.
Walkability has not been scored for De Pijp yet, but transit access scores 9.6/10. Until walkability itself is scored, those are the closest measures available.
Public safety scores 7.5/10, but that figure is national for Netherlands rather than specific to these streets — HoodEx measures safety at country level. For street-level detail, people who live there are the better source.
All neighbourhoods in Amsterdam
Tell HoodEx what matters to you — budget, commute, green space, how lively the street should be — and it ranks every part of Amsterdam against your answers. No account needed.