Fulham is a neighbourhood in Greater London, England, United Kingdom. It scores 6.9 out of 10 overall — good — based on AI analysis of satellite and street-level imagery across five categories.
Rent here is about 7% above the Greater London middle.
Modelled estimate for this area, not a listing or a valuation.
The strongest measurements here are road connectivity (9.4/10), climate comfort (8.8/10) and public safety (8.0/10) — road connectivity is the highest single reading on the page.
The weakest are privacy (4.0/10), environmental quality (4.9/10) and spatial comfort (5.0/10). A low reading is not automatically a dealbreaker — privacy matters far more to some people than others — but it is where Fulham gives up ground against better-scoring areas.
Green & air covers greenery, air and water quality, and the natural features around the streets. Fulham scores 5.3/10 here, which struggles.
Underneath it: green spaces 5.6, environmental quality 4.9 and natural features 5.5, each out of 10.
Comfort & safety covers how the place feels to a person standing in it — space, privacy, scale and street life. Fulham scores 6.4/10 here, which is unremarkable.
Underneath it: spatial comfort 5.0, privacy 4.0, human scale 6.0 and climate comfort 8.8. The gap between climate comfort and privacy is what shapes the category — the area is much better at one than the other.
Homes & buildings covers the buildings themselves: their condition, design and upkeep. Fulham scores 6.6/10 here, which holds up.
Underneath it: building condition 7.0, architectural quality 6.0 and upkeep 7.0.
Shops & services covers the shared side of a place — meeting spots, services, culture and safety. Fulham scores 8.0/10 here, which does well.
Underneath it: public safety 8.0.
Public safety and civic governance are measured at national level rather than street by street, so those two read the same across every area in United Kingdom — treat them as background conditions, not a verdict on this particular block.
Getting around covers how easily you get out of the area and reach what you need. Fulham scores 9.4/10 here, which stands out.
Underneath it: road connectivity 9.4.
Scores are only useful next to what you actually want from a place. Pulling out the measurements that tend to decide it:
Road connectivity scores 9.4/10 — the area is measured as better connected by car than by public transport.
Each HoodEx analysis of Fulham reads satellite and street-level imagery for the area and scores the five categories above; where there is more than one, the page shows the average.
Scores are a starting point, not a substitute for standing on the street. They are consistent — every area is measured the same way, so comparing two of them is meaningful — but they cannot tell you about a noisy neighbour, a good landlord or a bad bus route. People who have lived here can add that sort of detail on this page.
Last updated 2026-07-24.
Fulham scores 6.9/10 overall, which is good. Its case rests on getting around (9.4/10); green & air (5.3/10) is the weak point to check before committing.
Public safety scores 8.0/10, but that figure is national for United Kingdom rather than specific to these streets — HoodEx measures safety at country level. For street-level detail, people who live there are the better source.
All neighbourhoods in Greater London
Tell HoodEx what matters to you — budget, commute, green space, how lively the street should be — and it ranks every part of Greater London against your answers. No account needed.